TAMAS MIHALY AIThe Humanize Kit takes the AI out of your draft, rewrites it in your own voice, and gives you a score to prove it worked.
The same few words, the rhythm a bit too even, that feeling that no real person wrote it. And a list of words to avoid doesn't fix it. You take out the obvious ones and it still reads flat. The fix is two parts: take the AI out, and put you back in. That's what this does.
A paragraph of marketing waffle, run through the kit. The score is from the kit's own checker.
Same meaning. One sounds like a person. You see the number move every time.
Two skills that work together, plus everything you need to run them. You own the files and you get every update for life. No subscription.
Feed it a few things you actually wrote, and it builds your voice file.
It takes out the AI and rewrites it in your voice.
A number before and after, so you can see it worked.
You can, and you'll get partway, for one chat. Here's the difference.
Run the draft through it as the last step before you send.
22.0 → 0.0: from "three game-changing tools that will empower you" to "three AI tools I've been testing on real client work."
Catch the AI before you post, so it doesn't read like the rest of the feed.
20.0 → 0.0: from "I'm thrilled to announce… an incredible journey!" to "Last week I ran a workshop for a team of 12 marketers."
This is where sounding like AI quietly costs you trust. The extra pass is worth it.
Run their drafts through their own captured voice, in their words. One file per client.
I'm Tamas. I've been doing marketing for over ten years, and I use AI to write every day. For about three and a half years I tried everything to make it sound like me. Prompts, projects, all kinds of setups. They got good, but it was never quite me. This is the first thing that's properly good, so I packaged it up. I run my own and my clients' marketing on it.
One honest thing: this isn't a button that turns weak writing into great writing on its own. It gets you to a clean draft that sounds like you, very fast. The judgement and the final read are still yours. That's the point of it. Keep the human in the loop.
You can, and it gets you partway for one chat. The kit is the difference between that and a voice that holds up everywhere, every time. It's a saved file you keep and reuse. A prompt lives in one chat, then it's gone. It only learns from your real, AI-free writing (most people feed it AI-tidied text and capture the machine instead). It's built through a testing loop until it actually sounds like you. And it gives you a score, so you know it worked.
No. If you can paste text into Claude or ChatGPT, you can run this. The guide walks you through setup, and you can ask Claude to install it for you in plain English.
No. It's £29, once. You own the files.
It's built and tested for Claude Code, where it runs best. It also works in Codex and the Claude app, which both support skills, and in ChatGPT on Team and Enterprise, where ChatGPT supports skills. On a personal or Plus ChatGPT account, skills aren't available yet, so use Claude or Codex for now. There's a short setup file for each.
The rewrite works on any plan. The score runs a small script, so it needs a tool that can run code, which is a paid Claude or ChatGPT feature. For the full experience, including the score, use a paid plan.
It still takes the AI out and gets you to clean, plain English. For the "sounds like you" part, you give it a few real samples, even voice notes work. Two minutes and you've got your voice file.
The two skill folders, the worked examples, and the setup & use guide as a PDF. Everything in one download.
Capture your voice once, and every draft from now on goes out sounding like a real person.
Not ready? Grab the free guide first.